top of page

The Role of Microplastics in Environmental Biology: Implications for Human and Ecosystem Health




Introduction


Microplastics are an increasingly recognized environmental pollutant, found ubiquitously across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. Their persistence and widespread distribution raise significant concerns about their ecological impact and potential effects on human health. Microplastics originate from the breakdown of larger plastic items or are directly released into the environment in the form of microbeads, often found in personal care products (Cole et al., 2011). Their small size allows them to be easily ingested by a wide range of organisms, from plankton to mammals, raising concerns about bioaccumulation and biomagnification through the food chain. This article reviews the current understanding of microplastics in environmental biology, including their origins, distribution, and impact on ecosystems. We also explore the immunological context of microplastics, highlighting the mechanisms through which they may induce immune responses in organisms and discussing the broader implications for ecosystem and human health. 


Background


Microplastics are defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm in diameter, and they are categorized based on their origin. Primary microplastics are manufactured at this small size, such as microbeads used in cosmetics or industrial abrasives. Secondary microplastics result from the fragmentation of larger plastic debris due to environmental factors like UV radiation, mechanical abrasion, and chemical degradation. These particles have been detected in a wide range of environments, from deep ocean sediments to Arctic ice, indicating their global distribution and persistence (Barnes et al., 2009).


Immunological Context: Microplastics and the Immune System


Recent studies have begun to explore the immunological effects of microplastics on various organisms. Microplastics can be ingested by a wide range of species, including fish, birds, and even humans, through contaminated food and water. Upon ingestion, microplastics can cause physical damage to tissues and organs, leading to inflammation and other immune responses. 


The immune system recognizes microplastics as foreign particles, which can trigger the activation of innate immune responses. In fish, for example, exposure to microplastics has been associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress and inflammation (Qiao et al., 2019). In some cases, microplastics can also act as carriers for harmful pathogens or chemical pollutants, further exacerbating immune responses and leading to more severe health outcomes (Galloway et al., 2017).


Mechanisms of Microplastic-Induced Immune Responses


The mechanisms through which microplastics induce immune responses are complex and vary depending on the size, shape, and chemical composition of the particles.


Key mechanisms include:

  • Phagocytosis and Cellular Uptake: Microplastics can be engulfed by phagocytic cells, such as macrophages, through a process known as phagocytosis. Once inside the cell, microplastics can cause cellular stress, leading to the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Greven et al., 2016).

  • Oxidative Stress: Microplastics can induce the production of ROS, leading to oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is a significant contributor to inflammation and can result in cellular damage or apoptosis (Jin et al., 2018).

  • Leaching of Additives: Many plastics contain additives, such as plasticizers, flame retardants, and stabilizers, which can leach out over time. These chemicals can have toxic effects on immune cells and may disrupt normal immune function (Lithner et al., 2011).


Other Environmental and Health Implications


The environmental and health implications of microplastics are far-reaching. In ecosystems, the ingestion of microplastics by organisms can lead to reduced growth, reproductive failure, and increased mortality rates (Cole et al., 2013). Moreover, the bioaccumulation of microplastics in the food chain can have cascading effects, ultimately affecting top predators, including humans.


In humans, the ingestion and inhalation of microplastics pose potential health risks. While the long-term health effects are still under investigation, there is concern that microplastics could contribute to chronic inflammatory diseases, disrupt endocrine function, and increase the risk of cancer (Prata et al., 2020). Additionally, the presence of microplastics in drinking water and food products underscores the need for further research and regulation to mitigate their impact on public health.


Benefits and Disadvantages of Addressing Microplastics


Addressing the issue of microplastics presents both benefits and challenges:

Benefits:

  • Environmental Protection: Reducing microplastic pollution can help protect ecosystems and biodiversity, particularly in marine environments where the impact is most pronounced.

  • Human Health Improvement: Mitigating microplastic exposure can potentially reduce the risk of health issues associated with chronic inflammation and chemical exposure.


Disadvantages: 

  • Economic Costs: Implementing measures to reduce microplastic pollution, such as improving waste management and banning certain plastic products, can be costly for industries and governments.

  • Technical Challenges: Effective removal of microplastics from the environment, especially from aquatic systems, is technically challenging and requires advanced filtration and remediation technologies.


Conclusion

Microplastics represent a significant environmental challenge with wide-ranging implications for both ecosystem and human health. As our understanding of the immunological effects of microplastics continues to grow, it is clear that addressing this issue will require coordinated efforts across multiple sectors. Future research should focus on elucidating the long-term health effects of microplastics, developing more effective methods for pollution control, and exploring alternatives to conventional plastics to reduce the environmental burden.

 

Article prepared by: Chong Yuen Yeng, MBIOS R&D Associate 23/24


If you enjoyed this article, do sign up to become a part of our MBIOS family and receive our monthly newsletter along with many more resources in the link below.


 

References

  1. Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985-1998. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0205

  2.  Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., Goodhead, R., Moger, J., & Galloway, T. S. (2013). Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(12), 6646-6655. doi:10.1021/es400663f

  3. Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12), 2588-2597. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025

  4. Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(5), 0116. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0116

  5.  Greven, A. C., Merk, T., Karagöz, F., Mohr, K., Klapper, M., Jovanović, B., & Palić, D. (2016). Polycarbonate and polystyrene microplastics act as vectors for the transport of chemical contaminants in larval zebrafish (*Danio rerio*). Environmental Science & Technology, 50(16), 8934-8943. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02137

  6. Jin, Y., Xia, J., Pan, Z., Yang, J., Wang, W., & Fu, Z. (2018). Polystyrene microplastics induce microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut of adult zebrafish. Environmental Pollution, 235, 322-329. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.088

  7. Lithner, D., Larsson, Å., & Dave, G. (2011). Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Science of the Total Environment, 409(18), 3309-3324. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.03

  8. Prata, J. C., da Costa, J. P., Lopes, I., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134455. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455

  9. Qiao, R., Sheng, C., Lu, Y., Zhang, Y., Ren, H., & Lemos, B. (2019). Microplastics induce intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and disorders of metabolome and microbiome in zebrafish. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 246-253. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.245

Comments


Stay Up-To-Date with New Posts

Search By Tags

bottom of page